Tenika Mcgiffin vs Naia Mercadier Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 26 Aug at 08:01 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Mcgiffin vs N. Mercadier

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Mcgiffin 1 - 0 Mercadier
They have played 2 sets in total, with Tenika Mcgiffin winning 2 and Naia Mercadier winning 0. The last match between Tenika Mcgiffin and Naia Mercadier was at the W35 Heraklion, 26-08-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Tenika Mcgiffin getting the victory 6-0 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mcgiffin | 1 |
| Mercadier | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) W35 Heraklion(08-26-25)
T. Mcgiffin vs N. Mercadier H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 42.50% (34-46) | Career Total W/L | 45.68% (37-44) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
T. Mcgiffin vs N. Mercadier Match Preview:
- Which player demonstrates stronger second serve performance? Mercadier has the advantage, securing 7.14% of points compared to Mcgiffin's 0% over the past six months.
- Who excels in returning the opponent's serves? Mercadier again leads with 38.46% on second serve points and 23.08% on first serve points, while Mcgiffin stands at 0% on both.
- How does each player handle pressure situations like breakpoints? Mercadier proves more efficient, saving 12.5% of breakpoints compared to Mcgiffin's 0%.
- Analyzing match outcomes, Mercadier has a better record, winning 66.67% of matches in the last year, while Mcgiffin has yet to win a match.
- Have both players faced strong opponents? The data does not provide a rank comparison for Mcgiffin, whereas Mercadier has experience against higher-ranked players.
- If the match advances to a deciding set, neither player has a favorable track record, with both at 0% win rate.
- When converting breakpoints, Mercadier stands out by converting half of their opportunities, starkly overshadowing Mcgiffin’s 0% conversion record.
Editorial Prediction (August 26, 2025, UTC):
As we evaluate the head-to-head statistics and recent form, Mercadier clearly showcases dominance over Mcgiffin across multiple facets of the game. Key areas such as second serve performance, return game efficiency, and breakpoint conversion are significantly in Mercadier’s favor.
Mcgiffin's ongoing struggle with critical components like breakpoints and inability to capitalize on return games suggests areas of vulnerability. This could prove detrimental against Mercadier, who has shown better control and effectiveness under match pressure.
Given Mercadier's edge in performance patterns and statistical superiority, they are the predicted winner for the upcoming tennis match against Mcgiffin.
Tenika Mcgiffin vs Naia Mercadier Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Mcgiffin vs N. Mercadier H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 1 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:9:41 | Average Match Time | 1:9:41 |
| 62% (29/47) | 1st Serve % | 46% (18/39) |
| 72% (21/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 33% (6/18) |
| 56% (10/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 24% (5/21) |
| 75% (6/8) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (1/4) |
| 72% (28/39) | Return Points Win % | 34% (16/47) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Mcgiffin Recent Matches Played
N. Mercadier Recent Matches Played

T. Mcgiffin vs N. Mercadier Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 42.50% (34/46) | YTD Win/Loss | 45.68% (37/44) |
| 44.26% (81/102) | Sets Win/Loss | 46.15% (84/98) |
| 48.35% (778/831) | Games Win/Loss | 47.87% (820/893) |
| 38.24% (26/42) | Hard Win/Loss | 47.06% (8/9) |
| 66.67% (6/3) | Clay Win/Loss | 47.46% (28/31) |
| 66.67% (2/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 32 | Aces Total | 7 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 244 | Total Double Faults | 230 |
| 1:18:8 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 363.77 | Average Opponent Rank | 345.73 |
| 65% (2448/3751) | 1st Serve % | 61% (1154/1900) |
| 57% (1392/2448) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (574/1154) |
| 43% (560/1303) | 2nd Serve Win % | 34% (257/746) |
| 42% (182/431) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 55% (129/236) |
| 43% (1572/3663) | Return Points Win % | 47% (902/1939) |
| 43.33% (26/34) | Challenger W/L | 32.26% (10/21) |
| 40.00% (8/12) | Futures W/L | 54.00% (27/23) |
| 43% (34/80) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 46% (37/81) |
| 50% (4/8) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (7/13) |
| 43% (10/23) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (10/20) |
| 76% (38/29) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (39/32) |
| 24% (38/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (39/7) |
| 12% (42/5) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (42/5) |